History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine
25 Ohio St. 2d 184
Ohio
1971
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Mandamus lies only to compel the performance of an act which is clearly enjoined by law upon a respondent. Here, the respondent did not have possession of the property which relator sought to have returned to him by this action in mandamus.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

0 ’Neill, C. J., SchneideR, Herbert, Duncan, Corrigan, Steen and Leach, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 3, 1971
Citation: 25 Ohio St. 2d 184
Docket Number: No. 70-690
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.