History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Freeman v. Kraft
61 Ohio St. 2d 284
Ohio
1980
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This cause is before the court pursuant to an appeal as of right from the overruling of appellant’s motion for relief from a judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition.

Appellant’s arguments to support his appeal all relate to the merits of his original action, which might have been raised on a direct appeal to this court.

The question to be determined on an appeal from denial of a motion for relief from judgment is whether the court abused the discretionary authority provided to it by Civ. R. 60 to give such relief. Here, appellant presents nothing to establish that his contentions fall within any of the provisions of Civ. R. 60. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Freeman v. Kraft
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 27, 1980
Citation: 61 Ohio St. 2d 284
Docket Number: No. 79-955
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.