State Ex Rel. Foster v. HallState Ex Rel. Foster v. Hall
- Reporters:
- Before:
- McNulty, Liles, Pierce
The relator suggests prohibition to prevent the trial court from proceeding in a prosecution against him for violation of one of the offenses outlined under
The gravamen of the statute is to provide an investigatory weapon to law enforcement which they are not obligated to utilize. In this case, the prosecution chose not to use it and fully informed the defendant of his right to silence and that anything he said could be used against him.
The mere fact that the defendant was under subpoena to appear is immaterial. Compulsory attendance is one thing and compulsory testimony is quite another. The compulsion required to bring into play the immunity provisions of the foregoing statute relates solely to compulsory testimony.3 As pointed out above, it is totally lacking in the record of this case.
Rule discharged and suggestion dismissed.
LILES, A.C.J., concurs.
PIERCE, J., dissents.