History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Florence v. Zitter
105 Ohio St. 3d 1460
Ohio
2005
Check Treatment

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss or, alternatively, motion for summary judgment,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file her brief within 10 days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file her brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 5 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment be, and hereby are, denied.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Florence v. Zitter
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 14, 2005
Citation: 105 Ohio St. 3d 1460
Docket Number: 2005-0260
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.