No. 91-1059 | Ohio | Dec 11, 1991
Before mandamus can issue, relator must establish he has a clear legal right to the relief requested. State, ex rel. Fant, v. Sykes (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 90" date_filed="1986-12-24" court="Ohio" case_name="State ex rel. Fant v. Sykes">28 Ohio St.3d 90, 28 OBR 185, 502 N.E.2d 597" date_filed="1986-12-24" court="Ohio" case_name="State ex rel. Fant v. Sykes">502 N.E.2d 597. The Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, does not require that a public office create new documents to meet a requester’s demand. State, ex rel. Scanlon, v. Deters (1989), 45 Ohio St. 3d 376" date_filed="1989-10-04" court="Ohio" case_name="State ex rel. Scanlon v. Deters">45 Ohio St.3d 376, 544 N.E.2d 680. Accordingly, the court of appeals correctly granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment.
The court of appeals also correctly denied appellant’s motion to assess costs since the complaint lacked any merit. Also, pro se litigants are not entitled to attorney fees under R.C. 149.43. See Fant v. Bd. of Trustees, Regional Transit Auth. (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 72" date_filed="1990-04-11" court="Ohio" case_name="Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Woods">50 Ohio St.3d 72, 552 N.E.2d 639" date_filed="1990-04-04" court="Ohio" case_name="Fant v. Board of Trustees">552 N.E.2d 639.
The judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.