State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster, 44 Ohio St. 3d 106

Concurrence Opinion

Douglas, J.,

concurring. I am pleased to see the majority of the court reverse itself and adopt the position set forth in my concurrence (joined in by Justice Sweeney) in the original decision in these cases as reported in State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 404, 416-417, 534 N.E. 2d 46, 58. Obviously, I concur in the majority opinion,

Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

---

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

On authority of State, ex rel. Peabody Coal Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1989), 44 Ohio St. 3d 104, 541 N.E. 2d 74, we hereby grant Surplus Fund reimbursement in case Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312 for all amounts of temporary total compensation paid to the claimants herein subsequent to the respective findings of permanency.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. Lancaster

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations: 44 Ohio St. 3d 106; 541 N.E.2d 64; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 152; Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312

Docket Number: Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312

Court Abbreviation: Ohio