History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan
82 Ohio St. 3d 405
Ohio
1998
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 279, 658 N.E.2d 723, 724.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Eads v. Callahan
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 29, 1998
Citation: 82 Ohio St. 3d 405
Docket Number: No. 98-227
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.