By the Court
This case has previously been heard in this court upon demurrer to the petition, and the demurrer to the petition was overruled.
State, ex rel. Diehl, Pros. Atty.,
v.
Colwell,
The relator has demurred to this answer, and we hence consider'its legal sufficiency.
The well-pleaded facts set up in the answer and conceded by the demurrer do not affect the controlling question in the case, which still remains the following: When a probate judge has once approved the appointment of a humane officer, under Section 10071, General Code, may the successor in office of such probate judge revoke the appointment upon the ground that there is no such necessity for the service of such humane officer as would justify the payment of the expense out of the public treasury?
This question was considered at length and decided in the affirmative and adversely to the defendant. State, ex rel. Diehl, Pros. Atty., v. Colwell, supra. Upon the authority of that holding the demurrer to the answer is sustained.
Demurrer to ansiver sustained, and, judgment of ouster.
