State ex rel. Crebs v. Court of Common Pleas, 38 Ohio St. 2d 51

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Appellant seeks to have the constitutionality of the statutes, under which the action against him was brought, determined in this prohibition action. However, the unconstitutionality of a statute does not deprive a court of the initial jurisdiction to proceed according to its terms. Appellant has other remedies in the ordinary course of the law and by way of appeal. Furthermore, prohibition cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Rhodes, v. Solether (1955), 162 Ohio St. 559. See State, ex rel. Ellis, v. McCabe (1941), 138 Ohio St. 417.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, 0. J., Herbert, CorrxgaN, SterN, Celebrezze, W. Browíf and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Crebs v. Court of Common Pleas

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Apr 17, 1974

Citations: 38 Ohio St. 2d 51; 309 N.E.2d 926; 67 Ohio Op. 2d 61; 1974 Ohio LEXIS 420; No. 73-919

Docket Number: No. 73-919

Court Abbreviation: Ohio