64 Ind. 131 | Ind. | 1878
Complaint by the appellant against the appellees, founded on the official bond of a justice of the peace.
The suit was commenced before a justice of the peace in Randolph county.
Judgment for appellant.
The appellees appealed to the Randolph Circuit Court, from which a change of venue was taken to the Henry Circuit Court.
A billof exceptions informs us, that “ The defendants in the above entitled cause moved the court to dismiss said cause, for the reason that the transcript of the justice of the peace before whom said cause was tried showed that the justice made his finding, and rendered judgment, more ihan four days after the trial of said cause before him, which motion the court sustained, and dismissed said cause, to which ruling, in sustaining said motion and dismissing said cause, the relator, Isaac S. Cory, objected and excepted.’’
Judgment of dismissal and appeal.
This ruling is wrong. "When the case was appealed from the judgment of the justice, the, judgment he rendered was opened, and the case left pending as if no judgment had ever been rendered. The judgment, whether right or wrong, no longer existed. It was simply a pending suit. The case of Burton v. McGregor, 4 Ind. 550, cited by the appellees, does not sustain them. That case was a scire facias to obtain execution on a Judgment, not on an
We do not decide that the appeal might not have been dismissed, but are clearly of the opinion that it wa's erroneous to dismiss the action.
The judgment is reversed, at the costs of the appellees; cause remanded, with instructions to overrule the motion to dismiss the cause, and to reinstate the same for further proceedings.
