midpage

State ex rel. Copeland v. State Medical BoardState ex rel. Copeland v. State Medical Board

Ohio Supreme Court
Feb 9, 1922
No. 16763
Versions:
MARSHALL, C. J.

3. By the provisions of Section 1274-2 GC., it is required that persons desiring to practice limited branches of medicine and surgery without preliminary examination shall establish to the satisfaction of the state medical board the fact of having actually practiced those limited branches for the full period of five years continuously prior to October 1, 1915. The affidavit of the applicant of his having had such practice is not conclusive upon the board.

2. Affidavits attached to a petition and by proper averments made a part thereof may not properly be considered as evidence and do not tend to support the_ petition or sustain the burden of proof required to be met by plaintiff upon issue joined by an answer.

Judgment for defendant.

Wanamaker.. Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ.. concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Copeland v. State Medical Board
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 9, 1922
Citations: 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 165; No. 16763
Docket Number: No. 16763
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In
    State ex rel. Copeland v. State Medical Board, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 165