midpage

State ex rel. Chatfield v. FlauttState ex rel. Chatfield v. Flautt

Ohio Supreme Court
Mar 28, 2012
2011-1687
Versions:2012 Ohio 1294
131 Ohio St. 3d 383
965 N.E.2d 304

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the request of appellant, inmate James L. Chatfield, for a writ of mandamus ordering appellee, Perry County Prosecuting Attorney Joseph A. Flautt, to turn over certain records to him. R.C. 149.43(B)(8) required a finding by Chatfield‘s sentencing judge or the judge‘s successor that the requested information was necessary to support what appeared to be a justiciable claim. State ex rel. Barb v. Cuyahoga Cty. Jury Commr., 124 Ohio St.3d 238, 2010-Ohio-120, 921 N.E.2d 236. Chatfield obtained the requisite judicial finding from the Perry County Court of Common Pleas, but that court specified that the Columbus Police Department, not the Perry County prosecuting attorney, would provide the records. Because Chatfield‘s sentencing judge did not determine that the Perry County prosecuting attorney was the person responsible for the requested public records, Chatfield was not entitled to the requested extraordinary relief.

Judgment affirmed.

O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Chatfield v. Flautt
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 28, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 1294; 131 Ohio St. 3d 383; 965 N.E.2d 304; 2011-1687
Docket Number: 2011-1687
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In