72 Ind. App. 691 | Ind. Ct. App. | 1919
—This was an action by appellant against appellee to recover a statutory penalty. The complaint, which was in two paragraphs, alleged the failure of the appellee to make out and deliver to the township assessor of Flat Bock township, between March 1 and May 15, 1917, a sworn statement concerning capital stock, etc., of said company, as required by §10233 Burns 1914, Acts 1903 p. 49. Said section reads as follows: “Every street railroad, water works, gas, manufacturing, mining, gravel road, plank road, saving(s) bank, insurance and other
To the complaint a demurrer was interposed for
The memorandum filed with the demurrer to the complaint challenges the sufficiency of the complaint in several particulars, only one of which, in the view we take of this case, need be noticed, viz.: That the complaint did not allege that the assessor of said township did, during said time, within which said report should have been made, “call upon defendant, or defendant’s president, or other accounting officer, and deliver the necessary form of affidavit required under the law to be delivered, and required the defendant’s president or other accounting officer to execute the same and deliver the affidavit to the assessor, as required by law, and that the defendant company, during said months, never was given an opportunity to execute the affidavit.”
The appeal presents the question as to whether it was the duty of the township assessor to call upon the appellee, at its office in his township, and present the proper blank for the said report so required by §10233, supra.
It will be noticed that said section provides.: “Such schedule shall be made in conformity to such instructions and forms as may be prescribed by the auditor of state.”
By §10234 Burns 1914, Acts 1891 p. 199, §74, it is provided, among other things: ‘ ‘ Such statement shall be scheduled by the assessor, and such schedule, with the statement so scheduled, shall be returned by the assessor to the county auditor. ”
The statute in question is highly penal. It provides that the penalty therein named shall be incurred “in case of the failure or refusal” to make the report therein required. The use of the word “refusal” therein would indicate that some other person should make a request for the return therein mentioned to be made. As we construe these various sections, we hold that it was the duty of the township assessor to call upon the appellee and furnish it with the proper blank upon which to make the report in question and that, until this was done, the appellee, not having had an opportunity to make the report, was not liable to the statutory penalty.
We find no error, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.