State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan, 84 Ohio St. 3d 529

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Corrigan did not have any duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Carroll’s successive petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 271, 667 N.E.2d 391; State ex rel. Luna v. McGimpsey (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 485, 486, 659 N.E.2d 1278, 1278-1279.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Mar 3, 1999

Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 529; 705 N.E.2d 1226; No. 98-1697

Docket Number: No. 98-1697

Court Abbreviation: Ohio