85 Neb. 566 | Neb. | 1909
This is an original action for a writ of peremptory mandamus to compel the board of regents of the university of Nebraska to locate, equip and maintain two experimental stations according to the provisions of chapters 143, 144, laws 1909; sections 32/2-32/lé, ch. 87, Comp. St. 1909. Bespondents do not attack relator’s right to maintain this action, but assert that in each of said acts the legislature explained that the object of the legislation is “to determine the adaptability of the arid and semiarid portions of Nebraska to agriculture, horticulture, * * * such as the producing of grain, grasses, root crops and fruits of kinds commonly grown in same latitude in other states, also the most economical methods of producing such crops without irrigation.” Bespondents further contend that the funds under their control consist of the income of trust funds pledged to the support of a college teaching
Section 10, art. VIII of tbe constitution, directs that tbe general government of tbe University of Nebraska shall, under tbe direction of tbe legislature, be vested in tbe board of regents, and that their duties and powers shall be prescribed by law. Section 6, cb. 87, Comp. St. 1909, provides that tbe university may embrace, among other departments, a- college of agriculture. Tbe legislature has also authorized the selection of a state botanist, a state chemist, a state entomologist, and a state geologist, and these officials are directed to give special attention to tbe interests of tbe state in their respective depart-' ments. By section 8 of said chapter it is made tbe duty of the governor to set apart two sections of state land for a model farm as part of tbe college of agriculture. In obedience to tbe expressed will of tbe legislature, tbe regents have created an agricultural college, wherein instruction is given in tbe arts and sciences as appliecl to theoretical and practical agriculture. To create, develop and maintain this college, vast sums of money have been from time to time appropriated by tbe legislature to pay for improving tbe land segregated by tbe governor for a model farm, to purchase live stock and tools, and remunerate learned and skilful men for devoting their time and talents to tbe education of tbe youth of this state and to tbe collation and dissemination of facts relating to agriculture.
In 1903 tbe legislature by chapter 114, laws 1903 (Comp. St. 1909, cb. 87, secs. 32o32/), directed tbe regents to locate and maintain an experimental substation in Nebraska, west of tbe one hundredth meridian. The act of 1903, supra, and chapter 143, laws 1909, are identical, with tbe exception of tbe territory described in tbe re
The temporary university fund is derived from various sources and is created for the maintenance of the university. State v. Brian, 84 Neb. 30. The agricultural college is a constituent part of the university; and, if the maintenance of the experimental stations will advance the purposes for which that'college was instituted and is maintained, money may be appropriated from the temporary university fund to defray the expense incident to the creation and maintenance of such stations. Many townships in Nebraska are included within a region described as arid or semiarid. The application of knowledge acquired by observation, experiments and study is rapidly trans
The subject of education lias been delegated by the people to the legislature. In the exercise of a lawful discretion, which we have neither authority nor a desire to curb, the legislature, in' effect, has said that the experimental stations considered are necessary to the welfare and shall become a component part of the college of agriculture in the university of Nebraska. The board of regents is but a mere governmental agency expressly subjected by the constitution to the will of the legislature to work out its projects for higher education. They found no barrier in 1903 to the exjienditure of $15,000 from the temporary university fund for the purchase of land and the maintenance thereon of an experimental station, and subsequently have applied like apropriations for the upkeep of that institution. No lawful .reason exists for discriminating against the acts in question, nor for refusing to expend appropriations for an extension of the system inaugurated in 1903. Great latitude within certain lines is given respondents in the expenditure of the temporary university fund available for the present biennium, but the appropriations considered have preference over all other beneficiaries of the one-mill levy for that period.
The other defenses suggested have not been overlooked,
The writ will issue.
Writ allowed.