21 Wash. 227 | Wash. | 1899
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The relator is- a member of the police force of the city of Spokane, and the respondents are city
That case is cited and relied upon in the present case. But it is manifest there is a wide difference between the cases. There it was charged and confessed by the demurrer that one member of the trial board was so biased and prejudiced against the accused that no such thing as
We have not overlooked the fact that the applicant has sought, to bring himself within the case of State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of Education, supra, by alleging in his petition filed here, that the chairman of the board of police is biased and prejudiced against him and has prejudged
, The application for a writ of supersedeas is denied, and the alternative writ heretofore issued, discharged.
Gobdon, O. J., and [Reavis, Andebs and Dttnbab, JJ., concur.