History
  • No items yet
midpage
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 318
Ohio
1964
Per Curiam.

The right of an indigent accused to be furnished a copy of the transcript of the evidence and the records relating to his arrest and conviction at the expense of the state is dependent upon his having either a present appeal as of right from his conviction or an actual appeal pending pursuant to the allowance of a motion for leave to appeal. State, ex rel. Partee, v. McMahon, Judge, 175 Ohio St., 243; and State, ex rel. Vaughn, v. Reid, Clerk, 173 Ohio St., 464.

The time for relator to appeal as a matter of right has long passed, and, inasmuch as he has no actual appeal pending, he is not entitled to a transcript at public expense.

There being no clear legal duty to furnish the records demanded by relator, the writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Braxton v. Parrino
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 3, 1964
Citations: 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 318; 176 Ohio St. 318; No. 38489
Docket Number: No. 38489
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    State ex rel. Braxton v. Parrino, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 318