History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Bradley v. Berry
13 Wash. 708
Wash.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding in quo warranto, and involves the validity of the organization and existence of the town of Water-ville, as a municipal corporation. This is the only question presented, and as it has been heretofore expressly decided by this court in Pullman v. Hungate, 8 Wash. 519 (36 Pac. 483), and-subsequently affirmed in State ex. rel. Rice, v. Centralia, 8 Wash. 659 (36 Pac. 484), and Abernethy v. Medical Lake, 9 Wash. 112 (37 Pac. 306), and as we are satisfied therewith, we decline to enter upon any further discussion of the question, and affirm the judgment rendered in the lower court .herein.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Bradley v. Berry
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 11, 1895
Citation: 13 Wash. 708
Docket Number: No. 1932
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.