State ex rel. Board of Health v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen
48 N.J. Eq. 294 | N.J. | 1891
This court agrees with his Honor, the vice-chancellor, that the complainant has failed to establish by his testimony the existence of a nuisance, and the decree is consequently affirmed.
The other matters discussed in the opinion in the court of chancery have not been considered by this court.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiep-Justice, Depue, Diícon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 11.
For reversal — None.
