midpage

State Ex Rel. Blount v. SimmonsState Ex Rel. Blount v. Simmons

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 5, 1896
Reporters:
,
Before:
Faircloth
Faircloth, C. J.:

This is an action by the State, on relation of the Solicitor of ‍​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍the district, to vacate an oyster-bed entry, under the Act of 1893, ch. 287, sec. 4, and upon the hearing his Honor being of opinion, on the authority ‍​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍of State v. Spencer, 114 N. C., 770, that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, the plaintiff submitted to a non-suit, and, on motion of the Solicitor, judgment was entered against ‍​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍the County of Pamlico for the costs of the action, said county not being then a party to the action, but‘was allowed to become a party for the ‍​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍purpose of an appeal. The plaintiff assigns no reason or authority why the county should be taxed with the costs, and we •can see none. The defendant refers ‍​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‍to The Code, sections *11 536 and 537, and Bunting v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 633, in its behalf.

Judgment Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Blount v. Simmons
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1896
Citations: 118 N.C. 9; 23 S.E. 923
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In