*1 [Cite as State ex rel. Bevins v. Johnson , 133 Ohio St.3d 80, 2012-Ohio-3922.]
T HE S TATE EX REL . B EVINS , A PPELLANT , v. J OHNSON , W ARDEN , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State ex rel. Bevins v. Johnson , 133 Ohio St.3d 80, 2012-Ohio-3922.] Habeas corpus—Failure to state a viable claim—Adequate remedy at law
available—Court of appeals’ dismissal of petition affirmed. (No. 2012-0586—Submitted August 22, 2012—Decided September 5, 2012.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. CA2012-01-005.
__________________
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Andrew Bevins Jr., for a writ of habeas corpus. Bevins’s claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. Boles v. Knab , 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-5049, 958 N.E.2d 554, ¶ 1 (speedy trial); Thomas v. Huffman , 84 Ohio St.3d 266, 267, 703 N.E.2d 315 (1998) (equal protection); Bellman v. Jago , 38 Ohio St.3d 55, 55-56, 526 N.E.2d 308 (1988) (due process). Bevins had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claims.
Judgment affirmed. O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , C UPP , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ., concur.
__________________
Andrew Bevins Jr., pro se.
Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Hilda Rosenberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
______________________