midpage

State ex rel. Baker v. SchiemannState ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann

Ohio Supreme Court
Oct 13, 1993
No. 93-908
Versions:67 Ohio St. 3d 443
619 N.E.2d 692
Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 13, 1993
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 443; 619 N.E.2d 692; No. 93-908
Docket Number: No. 93-908
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In