19 N.Y.2d 974 | NY | 1967
Concurrence Opinion
(concurring). The affidavit of the director of the Testing and Advisement Center of New York University, under the auspices of which this examination was authorized to be administered by the Supreme Court order of November 6, 1964, the affidavit of the president of the Psychological Corporation, and those of the psychologist employed in behalf of successful candidates for the apprenticeship program, and of the tutor-co-ordinator of the Defense League, all of whom appear to have acted in good faith, do cast doubt upon the dependability of the kind of aptitude test administered to these applicants under the order of November 6, 1964. The very fact that the
A start had to be made, however, and was made by the order of November 6, 1964, and the candidates who took the. examination in November, 1966 are not to blame for adapting themselves to the system as it had been prescribed by the court order in a
Order affirmed, etc.
Lead Opinion
Order affirmed, with cost, upon the opinion at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Van Voorhis concurs in the following opinion in which Judge Scileppi concurs.