State Bank v. Cassels
87 Fla. 218
| Fla. | 1924
Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore 'been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for duplicity.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.