History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starsha Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
16-1739
| 4th Cir. | Oct 6, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins, FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action for failure to state a claim, denying her motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelity Nat’l Inc., No. 8:16-cv- 00906-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2016; May 11, 2016; June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Starsha Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 6, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1739
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.