History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starr v. New Mexico
254 U.S. 611
SCOTUS
1920
Check Treatment

Error, to the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico. Argued November 9, 1920. Decided November 15, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. *612144, 147. Mr. H.B. Holt with whom Mr. Frank Herron and Mr. W. A. Sutherland were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Harry S. Bowman, for defendant in error, submitted. - Mr. O. O. Askren was also on the brief.

Case Details

Case Name: Starr v. New Mexico
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 15, 1920
Citation: 254 U.S. 611
Docket Number: No. 80
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.