History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starr v. Clapp
298 N.C. 275
N.C.
1979
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Due to his absence on account of illness, Justice Brock did not participate in this case. The remaining six justices are equally divided as to whether the plaintiff’s evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to him, makes out a case against the defendants of willful or wanton negligence. Thus, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without precedential value in accordance with the usual practice in this situation. See, e.g„ State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E. 2d 260 (1974) and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Justice BROCK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Starr v. Clapp
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 3, 1979
Citation: 298 N.C. 275
Docket Number: No. 24
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.