History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starkie v. Nib Construction Corp.
235 A.D. 699
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Civil Practice Act, section 120,* did not authorize the filing of a lis pendens. No claim is made in the complaint against the property of the defendant. (Ackerman v. True, 44 App. Div. 106; McManus v. Weinstein, 108 id. 301.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Starkie v. Nib Construction Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1932
Citation: 235 A.D. 699
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.