midpage

Starkey v. HarveyStarkey v. Harvey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Mar 3, 1953
4167
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam
Per curiam.

This case is governed by Dame v. Company, 95 N. H. 125, and Vidal v. Errol, 86 N. H. 585. ‍​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‍The right to take depositions is a right granted by statute. R. L., c. 393. Where this statute is silent on questions of procedure and precedences in ‍​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‍the taking of depositions, it has long been recognized that the Trial Court has authority, in relation to cases pending before it, to make such orders ‍​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‍as justice may require. LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N. H. 413, 417, and cases cited. Neither the fact that the plaintiff was the first party to give notice of ‍​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‍the taking of depositions nor the pendency of the defendant’s petition to enjoin the taking of his own deposition indicate any abuse of discretion in ‍​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‍the Trial Court’s denial of the plaintiff’s petition and the order is

Exception overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Starkey v. Harvey
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Mar 3, 1953
Citations: 95 A.2d 140; 98 N.H. 96; 1953 N.H. LEXIS 22; 4167
Docket Number: 4167
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
Log In