History
  • No items yet
midpage
44 Ohio St. 3d 134
Ohio
1989
Per Curiam.

We agree with the findings and recommendations of the board. We are particularly concerned with the fraud perpetrated on the trial court by the probating of the revoked will. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended for one year from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Miller
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 26, 1989
Citations: 44 Ohio St. 3d 134; 541 N.E.2d 607; 1989 Ohio LEXIS 161; No. 89-394
Docket Number: No. 89-394
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Miller, 44 Ohio St. 3d 134