History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starbucks Corporation v. Amcor Packaging Distribution
2:13-cv-01754
E.D. Cal.
Jul 30, 2015
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:13-cv-01754-WBS-DB Document 71 Filed 07/30/15 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STARBUCKS CORPORATION, No. 2:13-1754 WBS CKD Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

AMCOR PACKAGING DISTRIBUTION,

et al.,

Defendants.

Third party defendant Ozburn-Hessey Logistics’ motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on July 29, 2015. David Klein appeared for the third party defendant. Thomas Moses appeared for defendant and third party plaintiff Pallets Unlimited, LLC. Manish Parikh appeared for defendant Amcor Packaging. No appearance was made for plaintiff. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

The motion to compel (ECF No. 64) is granted. Defendant shall provide further responses to the interrogatories, without objections, no later than August 12, 2015.

_____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: July 29, 2015

4 starbucks1754.oah

Case Details

Case Name: Starbucks Corporation v. Amcor Packaging Distribution
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Jul 30, 2015
Docket Number: 2:13-cv-01754
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.