midpage

Star City Sportswear, Inc. v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance of AmericaStar City Sportswear, Inc. v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance of America

New York Court of Appeals
May 13, 2004
Versions:2 N.Y.3d 789
2 N.Y. 789
814 N.E.2d 425
781 N.Y.S.2d 255
2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1043

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division majority that the contract’s warranty clause clearly requires that each escort contain a minimum of two guards. Plaintiffs proof was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it fulfilled that requirement (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562-563 [1980]). Defendant, on the other hand, offered sufficient proof establishing plaintiffs material breach of the warranty clause as a matter of law. Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graefeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Star City Sportswear, Inc. v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance of America
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 13, 2004
Citations: 2 N.Y.3d 789; 2 N.Y. 789; 814 N.E.2d 425; 781 N.Y.S.2d 255; 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 1043
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In