Star Boxing, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Star Boxing, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
Pursuant to
In the case at bar, it was undisputed that the “first application arising out of the arbitrable controversy” was the instant special proceeding to confirm the arbitration award. It was also undisputed that the petitioner commenced the proceeding by simply mailing the petition, via ordinary mail, to the law firm that appeared for the appellant at the arbitration hearing. Moreover, the law firm denied that it was authorized to accept service on the appellant‘s behalf (see
Accordingly, since the petitioner failed to properly serve the petition, the Supreme Court lacked personal jurisdiction over the appellant, and the motion to dismiss the proceeding should have been granted (see Matter of Hehl v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 203 AD2d 572 [1994]; INA/Aetna v American Mut. Ins. Cos., 115 AD2d 640 [1985]; Matter of Country Wide Ins. Co. v Polednak, 114 AD2d 754 [1985]).
In light of our determination, we do not reach the appellant‘s remaining contention. Adams, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.