History
  • No items yet
midpage
Staples v. State
124 So. 122
Ala. Ct. App.
1929
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

On Rehearing.
Upon a reconsideration of this case, and it appearing that the defendant was misled to his prejudice by the unintentional misstatement of the clerk and sheriff of the court with reference to the subpœnaing and serving of defendant's witnesses, and that defendant was, as a result thereof, deprived of the benefit of material testimony in his behalf, and without fault on his part, this court is of the opinion that the motion for a new trial should have been granted, and that the ends of justice require that this judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded.

The application for rehearing is granted. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.






Lead Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Reversed and remanded on rehearing.






Rehearing

On Rehearing.

PER CURIAM. Upon a reconsideration of this case, and it appearing that the defendant was misled to his prejudice by the unintentional misstatement of the clerk and sheriff of the court with reference to the subpoenaing and serving of defendant’s witnesses, and that defendant was, as a result thereof, deprived of the benefit of material testimony in his behalf, and without fault on his part, this court is of the opinion that the motion for a new trial should have been granted, and that the ends of justice require that this judgment be reversed, and the cause be remanded.

The application for rehearing is granted. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Staples v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 25, 1929
Citation: 124 So. 122
Docket Number: 7 Div. 559.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.