91 Ga. 127 | Ga. | 1893
Jackson, as administrator of Jackson, filed his petition to marshal the assets of the estate, and to set aside a deed held by Hardeman to the realty of the intestate, because, as alleged, based on a usurious contract. The bill alleged, in brief, that Jackson’s estate was insolvent, and that Hale and Stapler each held a valid mortgage on certain personalty of the intestate
When the case was heard by the jury, it was solely upon the question of the validity of Hardeman’s deed,