COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. William BOLDEN, Petitioner
No. 165 EAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 21, 2017
1283
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and “Motion in Request to Append this Petitioner‘s Illegal Sentence Issue” are DENIED.
John STAPAS, Petitioner v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., a Pennsylvania Entity; Giant Eagle, Inc., t/d/b/a Get-Go from Giant Eagle, a Pennsylvania Entity; Giant Eagle Inc., t/d/b/a Southside GetGo, a Pennsylvania Entity; Nadeen McShane, an individual; GetGo Partners South, a Pennsylvania Entity; GetGo Partners South--Maryland, LLC, a Pennsylvania Entity; and GetGo Holdings, LLP, a Pennsylvania Entity, Respondents
No. 123 WAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 26, 2017
1283
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
- Does the Superior Court‘s decision to reverse the trial court‘s finding of waiver, despite Giant Eagle‘s failure to object to flawed jury instructions, flawed verdict slip and/or the problematic verdict, all of which contributed to the error complained of on appeal, conflict with this Court‘s holding in Straub v. Cherne Indus., 583 Pa. 608, 880 A.2d 561 (2005), a case not considered by the Superior Court?
- Does the Superior Court‘s decision to excuse Giant Eagle‘s failures to object to flawed jury instructions, flawed verdict slip and/or a proble-
matic verdict, merely because the appeal is styled as a “challenge to the weight of the evidence,” conflict with the timely objection requirement of Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255, 322 A.2d 114 (1974)?
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Tex Xavier ORTIZ, Respondent
No. 174 WAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 26, 2017
1284
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue accepted for review, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether interference with custody of children,
18 Pa.C.S. § 2904 , can be the felony offense that supports a conviction of kidnapping of a minor,18 Pa.C.S. § 2901(a.1)(2) ?
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Jesus DELVALLE, Petitioner
No. 303 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 26, 2017
1284
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
BOROUGH OF EMMAUS, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
No. 247 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 26, 2017
1284