midpage

Stanford v. StateStanford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 14, 1920
11575
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Broyles
Broyles, C. J.

The evidence demanded the conviction of the defendant and the court did not err in ‍​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌‍overruling his motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. The accusation charged the carrying of a pistol concealed, and the carrying of a pistol without having obtained a license; and ‍​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌‍there was a general verdict of guilty. The sole witness was a police officer, who testified, that he came up behind the defendant and collared him when the defendant and others were ‍​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌‍stooping down in a circle at a street corner, playing craps, and the defendant said “ Oh, Lordy,” and ran his hand in his left coat-pocket; the witness told him to take ‍​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌‍his hands out of his pockets, and he withdrew his hands, “and in his‘hand was a .38-caliber pistol,” which he threw away from him; when he took his hand out of his ‍​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌‍pocket ,the witness saw the pistol. John R. Cooper, W. O. Cooper Jr., for plaintiff in error. Will Gunn, solicitor, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Stanford v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 14, 1920
Citations: 25 Ga. App. 487; 103 S.E. 728; 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 27; 11575
Docket Number: 11575
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In