History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stanford v. State
99 Tex. Crim. 394
Tex. Crim. App.
1925
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The conviction is for the transportation of intoxicating liquor with punishment of one year in the penitentiary.

The state has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of an insufficient recognizance. As it appears in the record it contains no *Page 395 recital that appellant stands convicted of any offense. It is not in conformity with Article 903 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The defect is in all respects the same as that pointed out in Westbrook v. State, 88 Tex.Crim. Rep.,227 S.W. 1104, which was held fatal to the appeal.

The state's motion must be sustained, and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.






Addendum

The conviction is for the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

We fail to find any sentence copied in the transcript. In the absence of the sentence, this court is without jurisdiction. See Art. 856, C. C. P.; Vernon's Texas Crim. State., Vol. 2, p. 851, and cases collated; Branch's Ann. Texas P. C., p. 338, sec. 667; also Bennett v. State, 80 Tex.Crim. Rep..

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Stanford v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jan 14, 1925
Citation: 99 Tex. Crim. 394
Docket Number: No. 8978.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.