425 S.W.2d 63 | Tex. App. | 1968
The STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
TEAGUE BRICK & TILE COMPANY et al., Appellees.
The STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Townsend CLARK, Individually and d/b/a Clark & Clark, Appellee.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco.
*64 John L. Bates, Waco, for appellant.
W. A. Keils, Jr., Teague, for appellees.
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Judgment in these non-jury actions was rendered August 16, 1967. There was no motion for new trial. The appeal bond was filed September 7, 1967. No notice of appeal in any manner prescribed by Rule 353, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure was given.
On August 25, 1967 a letter from appellant's counsel addressed to the district clerk was received by the clerk. It referred to the style and number of the cause and read: "I would appreciate your furnishing me with an estimate of the necessary costs to be used in determining an appeal bond to appeal the above case to the Court of Civil Appeals." An appeal bond was filed September 14.
The letter inquiring as to an estimate of the amount of costs is not a notice of appeal. We have no jurisdiction. The appeals are dismissed.
ON REHEARING
McDONALD, Chief Justice (dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. Counsel for appellant addressed to the District Clerk the following letter, which was timely received and filed by the Clerk:
"Law Offices JOHN L. BATES Suite 308 Medical Arts Bldg. Waco, Texas August 25, 1967 "Clerk Eighty Seventh Judicial District Court Fairfield, Texas 75840 RE: Standard Insurance vs. Teague Brick & Tile Co. et al. Cause No. 6042 & 6043B "Dear Sir: "I would appreciate your furnishing me with an estimate of the necessary costs to be used in determining an appeal bond to appeal the above case to the Court of Civil Appeals. Very truly yours, /s/ John L. Bates John L. Bates"Rule 353 TRCP authorizes 2 methods of giving notice of appeal: (1) In open court as therein provided, or (2) "filed with the clerk'. A notice of the latter type "shall be sufficient if it state the number and style of the case, the court in which pending, and that appellant desires to appeal from the judgment."
Such rule "will be liberally construed in favor of the right of appeal". Hunt v. Wichita Co. Water Improvement Dist., 147 Tex. 47, 211 S.W.2d 743, 744.
The foregoing letter states the number and style of the cases, the court in which same were pending, and under a liberal construction in favor of the right to appeal, may be reasonably construed as notice of an intention to appeal, or that appellant desires to appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals. And appellant thereafter timely filed its appeal bonds.
I believe this court has jurisdiction.
