History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stalnaker v. State
102 Fla. 638
Fla.
1931
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS AND TERRELL, J.J., concur. *Page 639

BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., dissent.






Dissenting Opinion

The court based its judgment upon the fifth count, which was in my opinion legally defective and should have been so held on the demurrer thereto. See third headnote in Mortellar v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 91 Fla. 230, 107 So. 528.

DAVIS, J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Stalnaker v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 29, 1931
Citation: 102 Fla. 638
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.