65 Mo. 74 | Mo. | 1877
The plaintiff sues to subject the separate estate of the wife, 13. M. Ivory, to the payment of eertain promissory notes which sire had given for & piece Qf land_ The and also the trustee, in whom was vested the legal title of the real estate sought to be charged, were made parties defendant. It is difficult to characterize in fitting terms the answer filed on behalf of the wife. Failure of consideration, in consequence of a defect in the title of the land purchased, fraudulent representations in regard thereto, and the damages arising therefrom, are all blended together. But the answer does not state in what the alleged defect in the title consisted, nor whether a deed had been delivered, or the nature thereof, nor whether the means of information were not equally open to both parties, nor is there any offer to rescind the contract. And as
II. As to the husband, he was only made a party defendant because the statute required it. No relief was asked as to him, and the court acted cor- . . rectly in entering a decree against the wife and trustee alone, which merely subjected the land of the wife to the payment of the notes.
Judgment affirmed.
Affirmed.