History
  • No items yet
midpage
St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels
55 Minn. 155
Minn.
1893
Check Treatment
Buce, J.

The motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal in this action must be sustained. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace. Issue was joined, and plaintiff recovered judgment against Mary Karels for $15 and costs. She appealed to the district court upon questions of law alone. There the judg*157ment of tbe justice’s court was affirmed. She tbeu moved for a new trial in tbe district court, where tbe motion was denied, and sbe appeals to tbis court from tbe order denying a new trial. Such an order is not appealable. Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, (34 N. W. Rep. 739.)

(Opinion published 66 N. W. Rep. 592.)

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Oct 27, 1893
Citation: 55 Minn. 155
Docket Number: No. 8316
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.