176 A. 304 | Vt. | 1935
This is a companion to the case of the same title,
It is plain enough from what we said in the other case, that a recovery could have been had therein for the services and expenses here sued for. But the plaintiff chose to proceed upon the statute above referred to, under which there can be no recovery, for the simple reason that that statute does not provide a remedy by suit.
One who voluntarily aids a pauper is without a remedy against the town. Churchill v. West Fairlee,
Judgment affirmed.