History
  • No items yet
midpage
SSM Consulting LLC v. CTI Teksource LLC
112 A.D.3d 437
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2013
|
Check Treatment

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered June 1, 2012, to the extent that it denied the motion for summary judgment of defendants CTI Teksource I, Inc., Steven Tucker and SSM Consulting, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly found the exception to the non-compete clauses ambiguous (see Greenfield v Philles Records, 98 *438NY2d 562, 569-570 [2002]). Given the ambiguity, there are issues of fact as to the specific conduct defendant Tucker was prohibited from engaging in and whether his conduct was impermissibly competitive or de minimis. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: SSM Consulting LLC v. CTI Teksource LLC
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 5, 2013
Citation: 112 A.D.3d 437
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.