SSC Corp. v. Town of Smithtown, No. 95-782; No. 95-826; No. 95-843; No. 95-914; No. 95-1005; No. 95-1066; No. 95-1091; No. 95-1120; No. 95-1149; No. 95-6851; No. 95-7024; No. 95-7033; No. 95-7037; No. 95-7047; No. 95-7055; No. 95-7065; No. 95-7096; No. 95-7101; No. 95-7102; No. 95-7121; No. 95-7144; No. 95-7187; No. 95-7192; No. 95-7210; No. 95-7271; No. 95-7287; No. 95-7298; No. 95-7365; No. 95-7380; No. 95-7388; No. 95-7402; No. 95-7470; No. 95-7489; No. 95-7567; No. 95-7611; No. 95-7624; No. 95-7631; No. 95-7788; No. 95-7813

Read

Notebook

No. 95-782; No. 95-826; No. 95-843; No. 95-914; No. 95-1005; No. 95-1066; No. 95-1091; No. 95-1120; No. 95-1149; No. 95-6851; No. 95-7024; No. 95-7033; No. 95-7037; No. 95-7047; No. 95-7055; No. 95-7065; No. 95-7096; No. 95-7101; No. 95-7102; No. 95-7121; No. 95-7144; No. 95-7187; No. 95-7192; No. 95-7210; No. 95-7271; No. 95-7287; No. 95-7298; No. 95-7365; No. 95-7380; No. 95-7388; No. 95-7402; No. 95-7470; No. 95-7489; No. 95-7567; No. 95-7611; No. 95-7624; No. 95-7631; No. 95-7788; No. 95-7813 | SCOTUS | Apr 15, 1996

*1150516 U.S. 1112" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/misura-v-county-of-el-dorado-ex-rel-woods-9268546?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268546">516 U. S. 1112;

516 U.S. 1074" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-01-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/singh-v-new-york-9268176?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268176">516 U. S. 1074;

516 U.S. 1113" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/loken-v-century-21-award-properties-9268562?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268562">516 U. S. 1113;

*1151No. 95-914. No. 95-1005. No. 95-1066. No. 95-1091. No. 95-1120. No. 95-1149. No. 95-6851. No. 95-7024. No. 95-7033. No. 95-7037. No. 95-7047. No. 95-7055. No. 95-7065. No. 95-7096. No. 95-7101. No. 95-7102. No. 95-7121. No. 95-7144. No. 95-7187. No. 95-7192. No. 95-7210. No. 95-7271. No. 95-7287. No. 95-7298. No. 95-7365.

516 U.S. 1141" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hughes-v-robbs-7393363?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7393363">516 U. S. 1141;

516 U.S. 1117" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/knighten-v-todd-electric-inc-9268605?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268605">516 U. S. 1117;

516 U.S. 1159" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-03-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/norfolk--western-railway-co-v-luther-9269157?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269157">516 U. S. 1159;

516 U.S. 1119" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/denikov-v-illinois-9268633?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268633">516 U. S. 1119;

516 U.S. 1147" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/desouza-v-new-jersey-9269009?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269009">516 U. S. 1147;

516 U.S. 1122" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/moore-v-tennessee-9268688?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268688">516 U. S. 1122;

516 U.S. 1124" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/verdugo-v-california-state-university-9268711?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268711">516 U. S. 1124;

516 U.S. 1125" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/brooks-v-united-states-district-court-9268732?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268732">516 U. S. 1125;

516 U.S. 1148" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/duncan-v-louisiana-9269027?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269027">516 U. S. 1148;

516 U.S. 1125" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/brooks-v-united-states-district-court-9268732?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268732">516 U. S. 1125;

516 U.S. 1126" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/powers-v-floyd-9268749?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268749">516 U. S. 1126;

516 U.S. 1127" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/cantrell-v-norcalsan-bernardino-inc-9268765?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268765">516 U. S. 1127;

516 U.S. 1129" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/dillier-v-california-9268789?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268789">516 U. S. 1129;

516 U.S. 1132" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/clemmons-v-stotts-9268829?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268829">516 U. S. 1132;

516 U.S. 1133" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/wright-v-illinois-9268843?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268843">516 U. S. 1133;

516 U.S. 1149" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/mayfield-v-california-9269041?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269041">516 U. S. 1149;

516 U.S. 1157" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-03-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/guess-v-karnes-9269130?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269130">516 U. S. 1157;

*1152No. 95-7380. No. 95-7388. No. 95-7402. No. 95-7470. No. 95-7489. No. 95-7567. No. 95-7611. No. 95-7624. No. 95-7631. No. 95-7788. No. 95-7813.

516 U.S. 1135" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/heirens-v-illinois-9268869?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268869">516 U. S. 1135;

516 U.S. 1145" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/contel-cellular-inc-v-leaf-river-valley-cellular-telephone-co-9268982?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268982">516 U. S. 1145;

516 U.S. 1136" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/pierce-v-united-states-9268895?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268895">516 U. S. 1136;

516 U.S. 1138" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/stites-v-united-states-9268915?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9268915">516 U. S. 1138;

516 U.S. 1149" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/mayfield-v-california-9269041?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269041">516 U. S. 1149;

516 U.S. 1150" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hazel-v-united-states-9269049?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269049">516 U. S. 1150;

516 U.S. 1151" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-02-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/burk-v-united-states-9269068?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269068">516 U. S. 1151;

516 U.S. 1163" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-03-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hicks-v-superior-court-9269217?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269217">516 U. S. 1163;

516 U.S. 1157" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-03-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/guess-v-karnes-9269130?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269130">516 U. S. 1157; and

516 U.S. 1166" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1996-03-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/fransen-v-conoco-inc-9269251?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="9269251">516 U. S. 1166. Petitions for rehearing denied.