History
  • No items yet
midpage
Squires v. Mallory
17 Johns. 3
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1819
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Unless there was a demurrer to the plea, the defendant could not have amended, under the 8th rule of April term, 1798. Here the plaintiff had taken issue on the plea, and the defendant could not, under the rule, amend, as of course, without costs. The motion must be denied, (a)

Motion denied.

The only authority for amending, of course, is the 8th Gen. Reg. of April tinder this rule, a plea, unless it is demurred to, cannot be ; Term, 17’Hi. Under this rule, a plea, unless it is demurred to, cannot be amended ; anti even then, a new plea cannot be added. Benedict v. Ripley, 5 Cowen, 37. Wiley v. Moore, 2 Wendell, 259. Silver v, North, 18 Johns, Griswold v. Sedgwick, 1 Wendell, 126. Rep. 310.

Case Details

Case Name: Squires v. Mallory
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1819
Citation: 17 Johns. 3
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.