Case Information
*1 Case 2:14-cv-02119-RFB-VCF Document 35 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
* * * SPRING NEXTEL CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-02119-RFB-VCF Plaintiffs, ORDER
v.
ACE WHOLESALE, INC, et al .,
Defendants.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation ECF No. 32 of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered March 10, 2016.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by March 27, 2016. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation ECF No. 32 regarding (ECF No. 20) Order to Show Cause is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
1 *2 Case 2:14-cv-02119-RFB-VCF Document 35 Filed 06/23/16 Page 2 of 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (1) Digitek Telecom, (2) Sol Mobiles Pvt. Ltd., (3) World Mobile Co., (4) Ali Sadaqa Trading LLC, (5) J2 International Ltd., and (6) New Way International Ltd. are held in civil contempt.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (1) Digitek Telecom, (2) Sol Mobiles Pvt. Ltd., (3) World Mobile Co., (4) Ali Sadaqa Trading LLC, (5) J2 International Ltd., and (6) New Way International Ltd. shall pay Sprint's reasonable attorney's fees and costs in an amount to be determined by the undersigned. Sprint shall have until July 14, 2016 to file a motion specifying the amount of attorney’s fees and costs it seeks.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rampal Cellular Stockmarket (RCS) is not held in civil contempt at this time.
The Clerk of Court is directed to serve copies of this Order on the following third parties by U.S. Mail:
Digitek Telecom Rampal Cellular Stockmarket (RCS) 811 Houston Centre 168 Jabotinsky Road 63 Mody Road, TST East 51361 Israel Kowloon, Hong Kong
Sol Mobiles Pvt. Ltd. World Mobile Co. A 204, Kol Dongi CHS RM2, 11 F Fiu Fung Mansion Darsiwada, Sahar Road 18 Austin Avenue, TST Andheri, Mumbai, India 480099 Hong Kong
Ali Sadaqa Trading LLC J2 International Ltd. Office No 1409, HDS Touers Flat 703
Jumeirah Lakes Towers 7/F Harbour Centre Tower 1 Dubai – UAE No. 1 Hok Cheung Street Hung
How, Hong Kong New Way International Ltd. New Way International Road
Britania House, Pier Road
Feltamy, TW140TW
DAT ED: June 23, 2016.
_____________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge 2