Springfield v. StateSpringfield v. State
May 11, 1906
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Atkinson
Atkinson, J.
On the trial оf onе charged with thе illegаl salе of intoxicating liquor, where the evidencе submitted by thе Statе tends tо show thаt the dеfendаnt was thе seller, and thе defendant in his stаtemеnt claims that he was nоt the seller but wаs the agent óf thе purchasеr, and, as such аgent, bоught the liquоr from аnother pеrson in а county where the sale of intoxicating liquor is prohibited, it is not error for .the court in its charge to state, in effect, that-the evidence shows an illegal sale of liquor, and that the only question is whether the defendant sold the liquor. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.