Spohn-Konen v. Town of BrookhavenSpohn-Konen v. Town of Brookhaven
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), dated October 6, 2009, which granted the defendant’s motion for a protective order pursuant to
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
While
To show that additional depositions are necessary, it must be demonstrated (1) that the representatives already deposed had insufficient knowledge, or were otherwise inadequate, and (2) that there is a substantial likelihood that the persons sought for depositions possess information which is material and necessary to the prosecution of the case (see Nazario v City of New York, 27 AD3d 439 [2006]; Hayden v City of New York, 26 AD3d 262 [2006]; Saxe v City of New York, 250 AD2d 751, 752 [1998]; Carter v New York City Bd. of Educ., 225 AD2d 512 [1996]; Zollner v City of New York, 204 AD2d 626, 627 [1994]). Since the plaintiff failed to sustain her burden of demonstrating these