History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spofford v. Smith
59 N.H. 366
N.H.
1879
Check Treatment

In chancery the defendant, instead of filing a formal demurrer or plea, may insist on any special matter in his answer, and have the same benefit therefrom as if he had pleaded the same or demurred to the bill. Rule 10. The answer may be amended by inserting the demurrer in it. The probate of the will raised the issue of fraud alleged in the bill. There is no allegation of insufficiency of notice or other reason why the probate court, in *Page 367 appointing the guardian and allowing the will, did not have jurisdiction. A decree of the probate court upon matters within its jurisdiction cannot be impeached by a collateral proceeding. Gordon v. Gordon, 55 N.H. 399; Lyme v. Allen, 51 N.H. 242; Railroad v. Railroad, 57 N.H. 200; Poplin v. Hawke,8 N.H. 124. When the answer is withdrawn, or amended by making the demurrer a part of it, the demurrer will be sustained.

Case discharged.

ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Spofford v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 366
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.